Procurement Procedures

Negotiated Procedure

The negotiated procedure — formally called the competitive procedure with negotiation — allows contracting authorities to negotiate the terms, technical solutions, and conditions of a contract with pre-selected candidates. Unlike the open and restricted procedures, it includes a genuine negotiation phase where initial tenders are refined through structured dialogue. This procedure is used when the contracting authority's needs are complex enough that an off-the-shelf solution or a straightforward specification is not feasible. In Finnish procurement practice, the negotiated procedure accounts for roughly 3-5% of above-threshold procurements, but it is disproportionately common in high-value, complex contracts — particularly in IT, healthcare, infrastructure, and consulting. For bidders, the negotiated procedure offers both opportunity and risk: you can shape the solution through negotiation, but the process is longer, more resource-intensive, and requires strategic engagement across multiple rounds. Understanding the procedure's rules and boundaries is critical to participating effectively.

Definition

The negotiated procedure (competitive procedure with negotiation) is a multi-phase procurement method governed by Section 34 of the Finnish Public Procurement Act (1397/2016), implementing Article 29 of EU Directive 2014/24/EU. The process begins with a contract notice and a participation request phase, identical to the restricted procedure. At least three qualified candidates are invited to submit initial tenders, which then serve as the basis for negotiation. The contracting authority conducts one or more negotiation rounds to improve the content of tenders. Negotiations may cover all aspects of the procurement except the minimum requirements and award criteria, which must remain unchanged throughout. The authority may reduce the number of candidates during negotiation rounds, provided this possibility and the criteria for reduction were stated in the contract notice. After the final negotiation round, remaining candidates submit their final tenders (best and final offers), which are evaluated against the published award criteria. The negotiated procedure may only be used when specific preconditions are met: the authority's needs cannot be satisfied without adaptation of readily available solutions; the procurement includes design, innovation, or complex characteristics; technical specifications cannot be precisely established; or only irregular or unacceptable tenders were received in a prior open or restricted procedure (Section 34(2)). The authority must document the grounds for using the negotiated procedure.

Legal Reference

Public Procurement Act (1397/2016), Section 34

View on Finlex

Practical Example

A hospital district (sairaanhoitopiiri) needs a new electronic health records system to replace its legacy platform, with an estimated contract value of EUR 8 million over seven years (CPV 48814000 — Medical information systems). No commercial product meets all requirements without significant customization. The district publishes a contract notice on Hilma and TED, specifying suitability requirements including annual turnover above EUR 5 million, at least two comparable EHR implementations in Nordic healthcare settings, and HL7 FHIR interoperability certification. Six companies submit participation requests; four are shortlisted. Each submits an initial tender covering their proposed technical architecture, implementation plan, and indicative pricing. The district conducts three negotiation rounds over four months, focusing on integration with existing systems, data migration approach, training scope, and pricing structure. After the second round, one candidate withdraws. The three remaining candidates submit final tenders, evaluated 50% quality and 50% total cost of ownership. The process from contract notice to award decision takes approximately nine months.

Common Mistake

Bidders frequently assume that everything is negotiable in the negotiated procedure. This is wrong. The contracting authority must define minimum requirements and award criteria upfront, and these cannot change during negotiations. If you spend negotiation rounds trying to alter the evaluation criteria or arguing against mandatory requirements, you waste valuable time and may appear uncooperative. Instead, focus your negotiation strategy on elements that are genuinely open — technical approach, implementation method, service levels beyond minimums, pricing structure, risk allocation, and value-added features. Read the procurement documents carefully to distinguish fixed requirements from negotiable elements.

Frequently Asked Questions

When can a contracting authority use the negotiated procedure?

Section 34(2) of the Procurement Act lists four grounds. First, the authority's needs cannot be met without adaptation of readily available solutions — common for complex IT systems, customized services, or integrated infrastructure projects. Second, the procurement includes design or innovative elements. Third, the nature, complexity, or legal and financial structure of the procurement prevents precise technical specifications from being drafted. Fourth, only irregular or unacceptable tenders were received in a prior open or restricted procedure, and the original terms are not substantially altered. The authority must document which ground applies. In practice, Finnish contracting authorities most commonly invoke the first ground (need for adaptation). The Market Court has examined these grounds in several cases and requires genuine justification — using the negotiated procedure simply for convenience is not permitted.

How many candidates must be invited in a negotiated procedure?

At least three candidates must be invited to submit initial tenders, as required by Section 34 of the Procurement Act. If fewer than three qualified candidates submit participation requests, the authority may proceed with those who meet the suitability requirements. The authority may also set a maximum number of candidates in the contract notice. During the negotiation phase, the authority may reduce the number of candidates in successive rounds (for example, from five candidates in round one to three in round two), but only if this possibility and the reduction criteria were published in the contract notice or procurement documents. Each reduction must apply the published criteria objectively. The authority must always maintain sufficient competition — reducing to a single candidate during negotiations would undermine the competitive nature of the procedure.

What are the time limits in a negotiated procedure?

The minimum time limit for participation requests is 30 days from the date the contract notice is sent to TED, identical to the restricted procedure. For the initial tender submission after candidates are invited, the minimum period is 25 days from the invitation date, which can be reduced to 10 days if a prior information notice was published. There are no legally prescribed time limits for the negotiation rounds themselves — these depend on the complexity of the procurement. In Finnish practice, each negotiation round typically takes two to four weeks, and the entire negotiation phase can span two to six months for complex procurements. After the final negotiation round, the authority sets a reasonable deadline for submitting final tenders — typically 15-30 days.

Haavi monitors public tenders for you

AI-powered procurement monitoring finds relevant tenders for your company automatically.

Ask Haavi

Chat with Haavi

Leave your details to start chatting with our AI assistant.